“Der Alter Bulgar”
Itzhak Perlman and The Andy Statman Klezmer Orchestra
Arranged by Andy Statman
Ascent of the Blessed
Hieronymus Bosch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ascent_of_the_Blessed.jpg
My seniors are looking at bits and pieces from Milton’s Paradise Lost. The character of Satan is probably the most intriguing in the poem. Some believe Satan is the hero. William Blake famously stated “Milton was a true poet and of the devils party, without knowing it”. The key phrase there is “without knowing it” because Milton begins the poem by saying he is justifying the ways of God to man and he asks the Holy Spirit to help him get the story right. Others point to these lines in the poem as the foundation for their interpretation that Satan, though an attractive character in the poem, is in fact the villain.
It is true that Satan has all the best lines and he is certainly heroic. But if Milton was in fact a Puritan and a devout Christian he would have it on Biblical authority that Satan is the Father of Lies and that nothing he says can be trusted. From this point of view Satan’s language is not so much heroic as it is seductive. He is saying what his human listeners want to hear and what sounds attractive to them. There is a bit of the rebel in all of us and the words of Satan resonate, we want to believe it is better to rule than to serve, that the mind can make something good of the most hellish circumstances (Satan says this much better than I but you will have to read the poem if you want to see what he has to say).
As a teacher I present both sides and tell my students that my heart is with Blake but my mind takes Milton at his word. A close reading of the poem does not give the reader an easy choice and that is the real thing for students to understand. We do not read to find answers or to understand necessarily but to learn something about ourselves and the way we think and feel about the world around us. Reading Paradise Lost does not let me rest comfortably on the side of God, the angels, and the archangels nor does it let me rest easily with the devil and his fallen friends. Reading well does not afford solutions to literary problems only the knowledge that how a text is understood depends to a large degree on how it is read and the point of view that is brought to the reading.
Will Richardson in his blog this week discussed how students are approaching knowledge and learning differently than in the past. There is probably truth to this, I know I learned differently from the way my parents learned and that different things interested me than interested them. Quoting from a MacArthur Foundation study he says, “Youth using new media often learn from their peers, not teachers or adults, and notions of expertise and authority have been turned on their heads.” I think on the one hand this is very exciting. Curiosity is the best teacher. But on the other hand many have a limited idea of what it means to understand something. Often we gravitate towards those with ideas similar to our own and as a result the information we get often conforms to the views we brought to the subject. Because there is a single perspective that resembles our own we are not challenged to confront the weaknesses in our views or to see the true depth of the issues before us.
This does not need to be the case but in a culture that has become so dominated by talk radio personalities who present a single side of an argument as if it were the only side to an argument the likelihood of this becoming the case seems very real. Curiosity and the sharing of information ought to be encouraged but there also needs to be a healthy respect for the conclusions of those that have thought deeply and long on a subject, especially when they arrive at conclusions different from our own. I believe in expertise. I think there are rewards for spending time in study and that those who have spent time in study have something to teach us. It is unwise to believe that the mind can function well without training. It is equally unwise to believe that those that train us have all the answers.
Jacques Derrida- Fear of Writing
In the video Derrida I think captures the struggle between a reliance on expertise and a need to explore an independent line of inquiry. Derrida invested a great deal of time with ideas and in the study of ideas. Part of his confidence probably flows from this. But it is the time spent in study that he also had to break away from; to learn to trust his own conclusions and not those of others that were taught to him. This is what an education should provide our students, the willingness to challenge authority and to trust to their own authority. But that education must also give them the tools to think clearly and deeply. If students do not trust their own conclusions and their own ability to reason to those conclusions they will be easily manipulated by others.
If on the other hand they have not been taught rigorously they will arrive at sophistic solutions. Discussions with “experts” often reveal the weaknesses in our thinking and show us where we need to do a bit more work. In my classroom I try to give the most difficult time not to those that disagree with me but to those that cannot articulate clearly their own point of view, whether or not it is my point of view. Real educators train students to clarify their thought; they do not tell students what to think.
As a teacher I try to act as Derrida’s sub-conscious acts in half sleep. It is my hope that my students will respond as Derrida does when he is awake; that they will have learned to trust their conclusions and the thinking that has brought them to those conclusions while recognizing that there is still a certain inadequacy to those conclusions. It is important to understand that the ideas of those we disagree with do have merit but that the merit of those ideas do not necessarily undermine the merit that is to be found in our own thinking.
When musicians improvise they trust the part of the score that is written to lead them safely through that part of the score that is to be composed in performance. Because they have mastered the written score, what the experts have provided, they have the necessary confidence in their own creative abilities to provide the parts that are missing and to go wherever their understanding of the music leads them.
I think that we have a very philosophical seventh period. History is such an important topic that relating it to the reading is very important. And thus being a member of that philosophical class leave you with a few words. Olive the important disscussions are held admist velcro covered canoes. Or something like that.
I agree with you to a certain degree about improvisation, but it also makes me wonder, what if the things we improv prove to ruin the music so to speak? When most people think of improvising and music, they think of jazz, but they forget that all musicians need some sort of creativity, or passion like in this week’s quote. I myself know that when I’m immersed in music, the things that come to me, come randomly, and depending on my mood, they change. I’ve never, ever, played the same piece of music the same way twice. Music is an extended appendage of a person’s emotions, and learning how is something that can’t be done, it must be felt.
(Have you listened to Debussy’s “Claire de Lune”? It’s my favorite piece written by him. :))
Mr Wilson: thank you for resolving the issue we had on the Civil War, it was less of only proving someone wrong and more of trying to understand why he might percieve the issues behind the Civil War, and how others also might see the War differently.
I agree that students should come to their own conclusions about different ideas and not rely on the thoughts of the teachers who are giving answers, but only to a certain degree. I believe teachers are meant to give students answers to questions the teacher deems appropriate. Students should be able to decide if they agree or disagree with the answer. School is where the minds of students are growing. We need answers to start out with and once we grow we can determine whether or not we agree. When a student is ready they begin to create and understand their own ideas on topics. The minds of students develop at different rates and I believe it only fair for a teacher to give an answer to a student who might not have enough information on a topic to create their own opinion. That said, I believe it is important to leave room for improvisation but sometimes a student needs a slight push in the right direction.
I agree with the statement that education is not meant to teach students the correct answers to things. Education is meant to expand students’ minds and enable us to make inferences about given information. School is not meant to give us answers that we have to keep in our heads for the rest of our lives because if that was the purpose of education, then there would never be new questions asked because everyone would already know the answers to all the questions. Education gives us the mental capability to read information, process it, and make observations about it.
I mostly agree with what you are saying. I believe that in English along with several other subjects that it is helpful for the teacher to guide me to answers, so that later on I can figure out problems by myself. Since history is a factual subject I find that it is easier to just receive the right answer but on rare occasions there may not be just one correct answer. That is the reason why the whole civil war debate got started. It is hard for people who think they are right to come to a common ground on debatable subjects. I think what Lisa said was correct since we were mostly trying to prove someone wrong.
This blog touched me in a way that was amazing. It is very rare that there is a teacher who is more concerned with showing a student how to understand why something is rather than to just know it is. I think that showing someone how to understand the meaning of something is a truly difficult task. It makes me feel as though, as a teacher, you show your true dedication to being a teacher. I agree that education is meant to help expand the vigor of ones intellect. Simply knowing an answer is not learning. it is important in life to understand why it is right. I agree with Melissa’s statement “Education is meant to expand students’ minds and enable us to make inferences about given information.” In all, i think this blog is very smart and that i am very impressed with your feelings and approach to teaching.